Sunday, January 30, 2011

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed into law in 2010, makes significant changes to our health care delivery system. Some of these reforms took effect in 2010 while many others take place in 2011. The following is a brief description of some of the most important provisions of the health care reform legislation that take effect this year.


Individual and group health insurance plans are required to extend dependent coverage for adult children up to age 26. While this requirement was effective November 2010 for active employees, enrollment elections made during the 2011 open enrollment period will be effective on January 1, 2011.

The cost of over-the-counter drugs not prescribed by a doctor can no longer be reimbursed through a Health Reimbursement Account or a health Flexible Spending account, nor can these costs be reimbursed on a tax-free basis through a Health Savings Account or Archer Medical Savings Account. Also, the additional tax on distributions from health savings accounts or Archer MSAs that are not used for qualified medical expenses increases to 20%.

Medicare Part D participants will receive a 50% discount on brand-name prescriptions filled in the coverage gap (i.e., the donut hole) from pharmaceutical manufacturers, and federal subsidies for generic prescriptions filled in the coverage gap will start to be phased in.

Health plans that do not spend at least a minimum percentage of premiums (85% for plans in the large group market and 80% for plans in the individual or small group markets) on health care services must provide a rebate to consumers.

Certain preventive services covered by Medicare are no longer subject to cost-sharing (co-payments); the deductible is waived for Medicare-covered colorectal cancer screening tests; and Medicare now covers personalized prevention plans including a comprehensive health risk assessment.

High income ($85,000 for individuals, $170,000 for married filing jointly) enrollees in Medicare Part B and Part D coverage will likely see their premiums increase. The income thresholds used to determine Medicare Part B and Part D premiums for higher income individuals is frozen at 2010 income rates through 2019 and will not be adjusted for inflation. Also, the federal subsidy for high income Part D participants is reduced, resulting in increased premiums based on income levels that exceed the applicable threshold.

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans can no longer impose higher cost-sharing for some Medicare-covered benefits than would be imposed by traditional Medicare Parts A or B insurance. Also, Medicare Advantage plans cannot exceed a mandatory maximum out-of-pocket amount for Medicare Parts A and B services. The maximum amount in 2011 is $6,700, but MA plans can voluntarily offer lower out-of-pocket amounts. Also, the annual enrollment period for MA plans is changed to October 15 to December 7 each year beginning in 2011 for plan year 2012.

Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Program (CLASS) is to be established to provide national long-term care insurance funded by voluntary participant premiums that can be paid through payroll deductions.

The disclosure of the nutritional content of standard menu items offered through chain restaurants and vending machines is required.

The requirement that employers report the total value of employer-sponsored health benefits on employees' W-2s was to begin in 2011. However, the IRS has deferred this requirement for 2011 so employers will not be subject to penalties for failure to meet this requirement.

These changes may impact your health insurance benefits and costs. To learn more about health care reforms occurring in 2011, consult with your financial professional.

The Year in Review

The Year in Review


Themes in 2010

In retrospect, it was a good year for globally diversified investors. But if investors had shaped their market expectations and decisions according to economic news, they likely would not have expected positive returns. The following are a few dominant themes during the year.

Mixed Economic Signals

Although investors in the US and Europe awaited signs of a rebound, economic news was mixed, with some measures showing gradual improvement and others offering evidence that the economy remains vulnerable. Favorable news included moderate economic expansion in the US, Euro zone, and Australia, as well as rising factory orders and manufacturing activity, rebounding auto sales and automaker profits, slowing growth in US bankruptcies, declining home foreclosures, and an improving financial services sector. In late Q3, US corporate cash levels reached $1.9 trillion, which, as a percentage of total corporate assets, is the highest since 1959. In late Q4, initial claims for unemployment fell to the lowest level in two years.

Negative news included continuing high jobless rates in the US and other developed markets. US unemployment began the year at 9.7%, dipped to 9.5% in July, but climbed to 9.8% in November. Personal bankruptcies in the US increased 9%, reaching their highest level since 2005. Also, bank failures in 2010 were the worst since 1992, during the savings and loan crisis.

Housing and Real Estate

The global property decline that helped trigger the 2008 financial crisis began to ease in 2010. Home prices improved in the UK but remained weak in the US, with monthly sales of new homes falling at one point to the lowest level since tracking was initiated in 1963. Foreclosures increased dramatically in the first half of 2010 before improving in Q4. However, 2010 proved to be another successful year for REITs, despite recurring predictions of a brewing commercial real estate collapse that would trigger a financial crisis.

Quantitative Easing and Fiscal Stimulus

Governments and central banks took additional actions to stimulate economies and shore up financial markets. The most direct support came as central banks supported government bond markets in the US and Europe. The Federal Reserve's November announcement of a second round of quantitative easing (known as "QE2") sparked concern that additional monetary stimulus would stoke inflation and debase the dollar. According to some, the actions helped lift stocks and corporate bond markets. In December, the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts and a 2% reduction in Social Security payroll taxes in 2011 improved economic expectations.

Sovereign Debt Worries

During the year, the weakening finances of some European states, including Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Spain, and Belgium, raised concern that the financial crisis had moved from private-sector banks to public-sector balance sheets. These concerns led to the downgrading of certain government debt and widening of bond yield spreads. The Euro zone countries and International Monetary Fund responded with loans that were conditional on some sovereign borrowers taking drastic austerity measures.

Inflation vs. Deflation

Despite moderate inflation in most economies during 2010, economists warned that continued government budget deficits and monetary expansion would drive up prices. Conversely, the US central bank was concerned that inflation was so low that the economy might slip into a deflationary cycle. In fact, potential deflation was one of the main reasons the Fed implemented QE2 and pumped $600 billion into the banking system. By year end, the Fed indicated that the deflation threat was easing.

Higher Commodity Prices

Commodities climbed during 2010, with many sectors reaching price levels not seen in decades. Copper prices, which are considered a bellwether of economic activity, rose 33%, and oil gained 15% to finish 2010 over $91 a barrel. Agricultural commodities, a traditionally volatile sector, saw even more extreme price swings. Concern about a weakening dollar drove up precious metals, with gold exceeding $1,400 per ounce and silver up 81% for the year.

Investor Confidence

In the wake of the financial crisis, investors who have become more risk averse or accepted the tenets of a "new normal" in the economy and markets chose to remain in fixed income assets. Bond funds in the US received a massive net inflow of money in the past two years, suggesting that many investors who fled stocks may have missed out on much of the rebound in equities. Throughout most of 2010, investment flows were leaving the US stock market and moving to emerging markets. In December, flows turned sharply positive in the US, with an estimated $22 billion directed to US stock funds.

2010 Investment Overview

After a slow start and a tough second quarter, most markets in the world ended the year with positive results. The US market indices accounted for most of the top performance, with the Russell 2000 Growth Index delivering a 29.09% return for the year. US small cap and small value also were among the top performers. (All returns are in US dollars.)

Most developed markets around the world logged positive returns, with thirty-seven of the forty-five countries that MSCI tracks gaining ground in both local currency and US dollar terms. Scandinavia and Asia had particularly high returns. Overall, the MSCI World ex USA index gained 9%, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index gained 19% for the year.

In the last few months of the year, the highest returns were generally experienced by countries whose economies are dominated by oil and commodity exports—for example, Canada, Norway, Russia, and South Africa. Other emerging markets, such as Thailand, Philippines, Chile, and Peru had strong returns. China, despite its continued high profile and news of economic growth, was one of the lowest-performing emerging markets.

The US dollar lost ground against the Canadian dollar and most Pacific Rim currencies, which helped dollar-denominated equity returns from those countries. The US dollar gained against the euro and British pound.

Along the market capitalization dimension, small caps outperformed large caps by substantial margins in the US, developed, and emerging markets. Value stocks underperformed growth stocks across all market capitalization segments in the US and had more mixed results in international developed and emerging markets.

Fixed income performed generally well, especially for investors who took term and credit risk, with long-term, high-yield bonds returning more than 20%. Real estate securities had excellent returns, performing comparably to the equity asset classes.